Legal Opinion

Knaus v. Rollof

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownitart, J.

The plaintiffs contend (1) that the tax commission never had jurisdiction because the record of the commission fails to disclose the time of mailing notice for the first or preliminary hearing; (2) the tax commission has no authority to order a reassessment after a lapse of *583two assessments and two tax-paying periods; (3) it was an abuse of discretion on the part of the commission to order a reassessment for 1919 after two assessments had intervened.

Attached to the complaint and as a part thereof was a copy of the notice purported to have been given by the Wisconsin tax commission, dated the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Town of South Range v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Baker v. HaugenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. PaxtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Connor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kelly v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API