Milo v. Curtis
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Presiding Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Fred P. Milo and the Milo Company (collectively “Fred”), appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion to terminate a receivership that was established after entry of a cognovit judgment in favor of the plaintiffs-appellees (“plaintiffs”). 1 We affirm.
In 1986, the plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement with Fred, the Milo Beauty & Barber Supply Company (“Milo B & B”), and Lonnie Curtis and Sophia Milo Curtis (“the Curtises”). The settlement ended protracted litigation between the parties. As part of the settlement, Fred and Milo…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Fore River Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Hoiles v. WatkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Milwaukie & Minnesota Railroad v. SoutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Neill v. Borreson (In Re John Peterson Motors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fontain v. SandhuOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Whipps v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Campbell Investors v. TPSS Acquisition Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dayton Lodge, L.L.C. v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dyczkiewycz v. Tremont Ridge Phase 1 Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.