Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Alphabet Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 8, 2023No. 5:20-cv-04687Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARSHALL DANIELS, Case No. 20-cv-04687-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 10 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES 11 ALPHABET INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court is defendants’ motion for an award of attorneys’ fees. The Court 15 previously deferred ruling on this motion pending plaintiff Marshall Daniels’s appeal to the Ninth 16 Circuit. Dkt. No. 46. The Ninth Circuit has issued a mandate and, pursuant to Local Rule 7-2, 17 this motion is suitable for decision without oral…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Egbert v. BouleSupreme Court of the United States · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API