Legal Opinion

White v. McBride

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1996No. 02S01-9510-PB-00104PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the plaintiff, attorney Frank White, may recover attorney’s fees from the estate of Kas-per McGrory. This broad question may, in turn, be divided into two specific subissues: (1) whether the contingency fee contract between White and McGrory is “clearly excessive” under Disciplinary Rule 2-106 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Tenn. Sup.Ct. R. 8, and is, thus, unenforceable; and (2) if the contingency fee contract is unenforceable, whether White may, nevertheless, recover attorney’s fees on a quantum meruit basis.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connors v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. The Florida Bar v. MoriberSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. Hail v. Nashville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  4. Cooper v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cummings v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Alexander v. InmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Swafford v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API