Legal Opinion

Trulock v. Merte

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 10, 1887PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Apjpeal from, Des Moines District Court. ActioN in equity to restrain the defendants from maintaining a private nuisance. On the final hearing judgment was entered perpetually enjoining defendants from maintaining the alleged nuisance, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

*511 l. n-oisaitce: adjoMngíot: joined?1 en

*510I. Plaintiff is the owner of lot 6 in Hager-*511man’s subdivision in the city of Burlington, on which is situated a dwelling-house and out-buildings. The property is occupied by plaintiff and his family as their place of residence. Lot 4 in the same subdivision is owned and occupied for a like purpose by Mr. Según. Lot 5, which is situated between lots 4 and 6 is owned and occupied by the defendants. The three lots are bounded on the west by Gilbert street, which is sixty feet wide, and on the east by an avenue forty feet in width. Plaintiff’s dwelling-house…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reed v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Sanders v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Singer v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Feldstein v. KammaufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Flood v. Consumers Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API