Legal Opinion

Stradley v. Pailthorp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus. Kelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order denying leave to relator to intervene in a certain suit. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The relator is a stockholder in the St. Mary’s Falls Water-Power Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this State. He petitions for the writ of m.andamus to compel respondent to vacate an order denying him leave to intervene in a suit in equity wherein Amos J. McOlung, as trustee, is complainant, and said water-power company is defendant.

The company issued bonds to the amount of $11,000 and executed a mortgage, to secure them, to Mr. McOlung, *288as trustee. The company defaulted in its payments, and Mr. McOlung, at the request of the bondholders, filed a bill in equity to foreclose…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burg v. B & B ENTERPRISES, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Hartman v. Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Sylvania Savings Bank v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API