Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Bouck

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. Buknell, Circuit Judge. This is an action in equity, brought to offset a judgment obtained by the defendants Carey against the plaintiff, Sta'n-ley, against another judgment obtained by Stanley against the defendants Carey. The facts are not materially in dispute.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. Buknell, Circuit Judge. This is an action in equity, brought to offset a judgment obtained by the defendants Carey against the plaintiff, Sta'n-ley, against another judgment obtained by Stanley against the defendants Carey. The facts are not materially in dispute. On the 14th of February, 1889, the plaintiff commenced an attachment suit for an instalment of interest not yet due upon a note of $24,281, which had been previously given by the ’ Careys to Stanley. In this action the sheriff seized a large quantity of…

1Opinion of the CourtWihslow, J.

The essential facts in the case are few and simple. Stanley wrongfully attached the property of the Careys September 14, 1889. The assessment of damages therefor was had in September, 1891, and a special verdict rendered, on which (as afterwards held by this court in Stanley v. Carey, 89 Wis. 410) the Careys were entitled to judgment for about $6,000, but wrere given judgment January 20, 1892, for only $800 and_ costs. March 1, 1892, Stem-ley obtained judgment against the Careys for deficiency upon mortgage foreclosure for over $10,000. February 5, 1895, that part of the judgment in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Kusterer v. City of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Courtney v. McGavockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Howard v. Town of OsceolaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Gauche v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wurtzinger v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Weigel v. GrimmettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Dankwardt v. KermodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Matter of Richland Bldg. Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF STASEY v. StaseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API