Legal Opinion

Sloop v. London

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1975No. 7519SC457PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign as error the granting of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence. In granting the directed verdict the court found, as defendants argued in their motion, “[t]hat the record contains no evidence . . . that would constitute a wrongful foreclosure in contemplation of law or. evidence which would entitle the plaintiffs to recover money damage from the defendants or either of them.”

As to evidence of damages, in a wrongful foreclosure action, it is not necessary to prove damages to withstand a directed verdict, since,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Bowen v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Mills v. . Building Loan Assn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. Harty v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Swindell v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust from WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of Vogler Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API