Legal Opinion

Graham v. Pomeroy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1936No. 32,832PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

'This was a workmen’s compensation case. The legal question presented is whether the claim for compensation was made in time. The trial court held it was. The employer and the insurance carrier have appealed.

Plaintiff was in the employ of Pomeroy and Graham, bakers, operating under the workmen’s compensation act. He sustained an accidental injury within the meaning of the act on February 20, 1933. He had taken out a medicial service certificate with the Pittsburg clinic, at his own expense, where he was treated for some time. He continued to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ketchell v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Klein v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Angleton v. Starkan, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Bull v. S. Patti Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Pittman v. Glencliff Dairy Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Solorio v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Riccioni v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API