Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Baldwin

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1954No. Civ. 19982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff owns Lot 17 of the New Haven Tract in the city of Arcadia, improved with a one-story residence. Defendant owns Lots 15 and 16 immediately to the north, improved with a two-story apartment building containing six one-bedroom and one two-bedroom apartments. The lots face west on Santa Anita Avenue. Defendant’s Lot 15 is bounded on the north by Haven Avenue. In building her apartment building recently defendant constructed a car port, the south masonry wall of which is on the common property line of Lots 16 and 17 and but 4 feet from the wall of plaintiff’s house. Defendant’s wall is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKean v. Alliance Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Nebel v. GuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Ukhtomski v. Tioga Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Blackfield v. Thomas Allec Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Phillips v. IshamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chico Feminist Women's Health Center v. ScullyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Bohn v. WaddellArizona Tax Court · 1990
  3. Casmalia Resources, Ltd. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Pearson v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API