Legal Opinion

Blackfield v. Thomas Allec Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1932No. Docket No. 8569PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANS, J., pro tem.

The action is one for injunction to compel removal of an overhanging wall. The trial court denied the injunctive relief sought, but awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $200; and plaintiff has taken an appeal which is presented on the judgment-roll alone. The sole question to be determined is whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding damages instead of granting the injunctive relief.

The facts as found by the court are as follows: Appellant and respondent own adjoining lots in San Francisco. Upon the lot of appellant is a two-story dwelling, completed in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKean v. Alliance Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Rothaermel v. AmerigeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Dolske v. GormleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Nebel v. GuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Ukhtomski v. Tioga Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Baglione v. LeueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API