Legal Opinion

BAYNES v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01369Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HELEN BAYNES, ) Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1369 . ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly . Re: ECF No. 73 BOROUGH OF WILKINSBURG, ) Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER KELLY, Magistrate Judge Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Borough of Wilkinsburg (“the Borough”), moving to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. ECF No. 73. For the reasons that follow, the Motion to Dismiss…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API