Frontier Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Douglass
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent · BistlineBistline, Justice
This office originally circulated to the Court membership a final draft of a proposed majority opinion, much of which now comprises this dissenting opinion. That opinion failed to obtain a majority, and now is meaningless ancient history, other than serving to demonstrate the collegiality of the Court as presently constituted. Justice McDevitt, in authoring his opinion which has gained a majority, embodies much of what this office wrote earlier.
Putting that observation aside, I add that Justice McDevitt’s majority opinion is well written; it represents one view. I write to set forth my…
Also in this document: Dissent · Bistline.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.