Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Field v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

-This is an original proceeding commenced in this court by the Police Commissioners of Kansas City to obtain a peremptory writ of mandamus against the City Council of that city to compel the appropriation, under the provisions of Chapter 38, Article XXIII, Revised Statutes 1929, of the sum of $1,442,425, the amount estimated by the relators as the cost of the police department of Kansas City for the fiscal year 1931-2. The return alleges the uneonstitutionality of the Statute.

What is now Article XXIII of Chapter 38, Revised Statutes 1929, creates and establishes within every city of the State…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. People v. Monterey Fish Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Board of Commissioners v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. State Ex Rel. Carpenter v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Pollard v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Priest v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API