Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Van Pelt

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 12, 1919PublishedCited by 75 opinions

A Writ of Error to the Court of Record for Escambia County; C. M. Jones, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

— In a criminal prosecution Bailey was charged with having “knowingly and wilfully failed to keep and perform certain rules and regulations made and promulgated by the Live Stock Sanitary Board of the State of Florida, to-wit: as owner in charge of cattle and premises, and having been served with official written notice he, the said EL K. Bailey, failed to thoroughly and-properly dip said cattle regularly every fourteen (14) days until such time as it is ascertained by regular inspection and dipping that-the cattle and premises are free of ticks, against the form of the Statute in such case…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Chiles v. CHILDREN A, B, C, D, E, AND FSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. City of Miami Beach v. Fleetwood Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  5. State Plant Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1959

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API