Legal Opinion

Dow v. Hc2, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 27, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2021-1197Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. ROSEMARIE A. DOW, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1197 (JDB) HC2, INC., dba HIRE COUNSEL, and PAE LABAT-ANDERSON, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Rosemarie Dow, an attorney admitted to the D.C. Bar, together with four other plaintiffs, filed a qui tam action against two Department of Justice contractors, alleging violations of the False Claims Act,

31 U.S.C. §§ 3729

et seq. Compl. [ECF No. 3]. Last Spring, the United States notified the Court that it would not intervene in the action.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Timson v. SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States Ex Rel. Mergent Services v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Onan (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API