Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernard Watkins

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2012No. 10-4076PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J., joined by Cox, D.J.,

MERRITT, J. (pp. 854-56), delivered a separate opinion dissenting in part.

OPINION

COOK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Bernard K. Watkins, an African-American supervisor of security-systems contracts for a school district in Cleveland, Ohio, corruptly solicited and obtained money from a contractor of security cameras. An all-white jury found him guilty of two counts of attempted extortion “under color of official right” in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951,1 and one count of bribery in a federally funded program in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B).2 At sentencing, the district court…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Russell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. State of Iowa v. Kenneth L. LillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. United States v. Joe HeadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Eric WendlandtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. PhilliposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API