Legal Opinion

Menere v. Copper Range Consolidated Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Houghton; Streeter, J. Case by Paul Menere against the Copper Range Consolidated Company for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant in the construction of a certain ladderway provided for the use of its employés in the performance of their work as miners in its exploration shaft, Some 65 feet above the bottom of the shaft was a pumping station. Below this, the ladderway was constructed of ladders some 16 feet in length placed one above the other and joined together at the ends.

Youch, the shift boss, testified:

“Now, to get at this shaft and to describe it properly, the Globe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. White v. Township of RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kleinfelt v. J. H. Somers Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Delbusso v. American Cement Plaster Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Rule v. GiuglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lobenstein v. Whitehead & Kales Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API