Legal Opinion

AMADO AND MONTEIRO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1969No. 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1951 MATTER OF AMADO AND MONTEMO In Visa Petition Proceedings A-18018518-9 Decided by Board April 1, 1969 Beneficiaries—the illegitimate children of the United States citizen petition- er's husband and two other women—whom petitioner has never seen, with whom she. has had no personal contact, and who live with their respective natural mothers, are not the stepchildren of petitioner under section 101(b) (1) (B), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, within the close-family-unit rationale of Nation v. Eeperdy,

239 F. Supp 531

(1965). While the circumstances of the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nation v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. Andrade v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. THEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ANSELMOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  2. K-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1993
  3. GONZALEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  4. Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. MANGABATBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API