Legal Opinion

Blaine v. White

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 2, 1920No. 1312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceeding between Joseph R. Blaine and Joseph White. From an award of priority against him, the former appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

Blaine appeals from an award of priority against him in an interference proceeding. The invention involved relates to a sheet-guide adjustment on a printing press. We do not think it necessary to set out any of the counts of the issue, in view of the manner in which we think the matter should be disposed of. Blaine moved to dissolve the interference on the ground that count 1 was unpatentable, in view of the prior art, and that the party, White, had no right to make count 2 of the issue. This motion was overruled by the law examiner. White’s motion to amend by adding…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oldroyd v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  2. Chessin v. KlahnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  3. Goodrum v. ClementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  4. Stern v. SchroederCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API