Legal Opinion

Stern v. Schroeder

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1929No. Patent Appeal No. 2160Published

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal, in an interference proceeding^ from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of the invention to appellees.

The apparatus involved in the interference is used for scoring and slotting blanks *516of pasteboard in the production of folding boxes or cartons.

The counts of the interference read as follows:

“1. In a rotary box blanking machine, means for slotting a blank on opposite edges, and means for creasing the blank between said slots, said slotting and creasing means being constantly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Oldroyd v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  3. Ruth v. GrochCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  4. Blaine v. WhiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API