Legal Opinion

Muhlenbrinck v. Pooler

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiffs from an interlocutory judgment, directed by the court upon a trial of this action at the Special Term

1Opinion of the Court

Daniels, J.:

The testator brought this action to secure a lease for a second term of the premises situated on the corner of Elizabeth and Spring streets, in the city of New York. At the time when the action was brought the premises were owned by the defendants Peter McDonough, Marie Therese Furey and Lewis J. Eurey. The original lease was executed by Mary Davey, who was at the time the owner of the leasehold premises, and it was given for the term of fourteen years from the 1st 'of November, 1854. The lessee occupied the premises under the lease for that term, and since then for a succeeding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Piggot v. MasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  3. Carr v. EllisonNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. De Ridder v. M'KnightNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  5. Banker v. BrakerNew York Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Paul Jones & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API