Legal Opinion

Banker v. Braker

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

Express covenants, it is said, should be taken strictly (Shubrick v. Salmond, 3 Burr. 1639). At furthest, when construction is called for, a covenant should be fairly and reasonably considered, and good faith in its performance should be upheld according to the intention of the parties. This intention is to be gathered, when extrinsic facts can give no clue, from the written words of the parties, which are to be fairly interpreted. A construction, however, should not be adopted, unless the words cannot be otherwise rendered, which would lead' to illegality or produce inequitable results. '

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Piggot v. MasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Rutgers v. HunterNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  3. Willis v. AstorNew York Court of Chancery · 1845

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burns v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Muhlenbrinck v. PoolerNew York Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API