Legal Opinion

Bay Fireworks, Inc. v. Frenkel & Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 5, 2005No. 2:04-cv-02463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the motion of defendants Frenkel & Co., Inc., (“Frenkel”), AGF Aviation Marine Transport (“AGF”), and Union Dry Dock & Repair Co. (“UDD”) to dismiss the complaint of Bay Fireworks, Inc., (“BFI” or the “Plaintiff’) (collectively, the “Defendants”), on the basis of res judicata, or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, UDD moves to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in New York.

BACK…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
  2. Lee v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API