Legal Opinion

Riley v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1915No. 22,769PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (95,-801); John C. Buckleshaus, Special Judge. Action by Joseph E. Bell against Thomas A. Riley, Clerk of the city of Indianapolis. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

There is involved in this appeal the question of the validity of an ordinance, passed by the common council of the city of Indianapolis, August 24, 1914, vetoed by the mayor and duly passed over his veto, September 27,1914. This ordinance sought to provide for revising, codifying, indexing and publishing the ordinances of the city and to authorize appellant as city clerk to employ two lawyers to do the work under the direction of the department of law of the city. It was designated General Ordinance, No. 25, 1914. The lower court adjudicated the ordinance to be void on the ground that it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re CuddebackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Gregory v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People Ex Rel. Press Publishing Co. v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Matter of MaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Doering v. SwobodaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State ex rel. Thompson v. WheatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. VoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Troy v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API