Legal Opinion

Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1984No. Appeal, No. 347 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

In this workmen’s compensation appeal the question presented is whether a physician’s testimony that granulomatous liver disease occurs “much more commonly” in the rubber industry than in the general population satisfies the statutory requirement that the disease incidence be “substantially greater in that industry or occupation than in the general population.” Section 108(n)(3) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1

*97For twenty-two years Engene Berry (claimant) mixed large batches of chemicals necessary to the manufacture of rubber products by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Allegheny v. GalloCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. May Department Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Cavallo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Landis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API