United States v. Hardeman
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this federal prosecution for failure to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, defendant moves to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the Act violates the Commerce Clause and that he was not in fact required to register as a sex offender under the Act. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is Denied.
STATEMENT
In November 2008, defendant Gary Hardeman was indicted on one count of failure to register as a sex offender…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Scarborough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- United States v. BarnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Kasckarow v. Board of Examiners of Sex OffendersNew York Supreme Court · 2011