Legal Opinion
Kaye v. Doe
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The issues which require resolution on these motions involve the construction, applicability and constitutionality of the recently enacted New York statute providing for service of process in this State upon an insurance company not authorized to do business here, where the suit is instituted by an injured person on the basis of an uncollectible judgment obtained against the assured, and also the meaning and efficacy of the clauses contained in the policy of liability insurance which provide for service upon named resident attorneys. I am told that this is a matter of first impression, and I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ace Grain Co. v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clarke v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Allstate Insurance v. Administratia Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Clifton Products, Inc. v. American Universal InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Meridian Trading Corp. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Peka, Inc. v. KayeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.