Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Administratia Asigurarilor De Stat

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1995No. 86 Civ. 2365 (DNE)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This action arises out of a series of insurance transactions involving. Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate” or “plaintiff’) and defendants, thirty-three reinsurance companies. 1 Pursuant to New York Insurance Law section 1213(c)(1), Allstate contends that each defendant must post a pre-filing security in an amount sufficient to cover Allstate’s claim against that defendant. In addition, Allstate and defendant Societe Céntrale de Reassurance (“SCR”) move for leave to amend their respective pleadings.

Before proceeding to the facts of this case, it is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Unigard Security Insurance Company, Inc., Successor to Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. In re General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of International Ribbon Mills, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Unigard Security Insurance v. North River InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. SchenckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farid v. BoueyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
  2. Saxholm AS v. Dynal, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Allstate Insurance v. Administratia Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Gallegos v. Brandeis SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Administratia Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API