Legal Opinion

Roxana Petroleum Co. v. Rush

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1924No. 4102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

What is set out in the transcript of the record in this case under the caption “Narrative Statement of Evidence” appears to be an unabridged copy of notes taken by a reporter at the trial, with attached copies of exhibits offered in evidence, and statements of the contents of other exhibits so offered. A large part of the reporter’s notes covers incidents in the trial having no bearing on the matters relied on as grounds for a reversal. There was a flagrant disregard of the following requirement of equity rule 75:

*846“The evidence to be included in the record shall not be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bonvillain v. BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Moss0 v. Gilchrist-Fordney Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API