Legal Opinion
United States v. Infelise
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 23, 1996No. 90 CR 87PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Before the court are petitions by defendants and third parties seeking to amend a 1992 criminal forfeiture order entered by the court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963. In addition, the United States seeks a final forfeiture order and moves for forfeiture of various substitute assets pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(m).
Background
Salvatore Y. DeLaurentis and Rocco E. Infelise were among twenty defendants convicted in 1992 of conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962. The RICO…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In the Matter of Nancy S. Marchiando, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of State of Illinois, Department of the LotteryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Richard A. GinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Merle BENNETT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Howard S. Goldblatt v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. ScardinoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- United States v. WittigDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007