McGilvray v. Hallmark Financial Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the plaintiffs motion to remand this action to the Circuit Court for the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. For the reasons which follow, the court will DENY the motion.
7. Factual and Procedural Background
The plaintiff commenced this action on March 16, 1995, by filing a Motion for Judgment (“the complaint”) in the state court noted above. Plaintiff was a customer of defendant Blockbuster Videos, who purchased several videos from Blockbuster on November 14, 1993. The check used to pay for the items was returned for insufficient funds.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- No. 94-3025Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Angel M. Cosme Nieves v. Col. Robert C. Deshler, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Moore v. DeBiaseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bingham v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Whaley v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020