Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although identification testimony of a prosecution witness was bolstered by testimony from a police investigator regarding a lineup (see, People v Holt, 67 NY2d 819, 821), the issue has not been preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Were we to reach the merits, we would conclude that the error is harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt (see, People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969; People v Lomack, 174 AD2d 1037, lv denied 79 NY2d 829).

County Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding defendant’s alibi witness from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. HoltNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. LomackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MillioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API