LeBlanc v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek judicial review of the final agency action taken by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), Region V (“Region 5”) to issue an underground injection control (“UIC”) permit to Core Energy, LLC (“Core Energy” or “permittee”). Because the EPA and the Environmental Appeals Board (“Board”) properly followed all statutorily mandated procedures in issuing the UIC permit to Core Energy and the Board correctly determined that the Le-Blancs failed to satisfy the requirements for Board review, we deny the relief sought under the petition for review.
I
T…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Spitzer Great Lakes Ltd., Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Conteers LLC v. City of Akron, Summit County, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Dozier v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025