Legal Opinion
Spitzer Great Lakes Ltd., Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1999No. 97-3489PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Jones, J.,
RYAN, J. (pp. 417-19), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Spitzer Great Lakes Ltd., Company (“Spitzer”) was assessed a civil penalty by an EPA administrative law judge (“ALJ”) for violations of the Toxic *413Substances Control Act (the “TSCA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2692. Relying on misleading language contained in the ALJ’s order, Spitzer filed an untimely appeal with the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (the “Board”). The Board rejected the appeal, finding no special circumstances that warranted the relaxation of the EPA’s timeliness requirements. We conclude,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Monsanto Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Puerto Rico Sun Oil Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Michigan v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steeltech, Ltd. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- HML II, Inc. v. Ginley (In Re HML II, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Isle Royale Boaters Association v. Gale NortonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- LeBlanc v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Michigan Department of Environmental Quality v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.