Legal Opinion

United States v. Quick

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 31, 2014No. NMCCA 201300341 GENERAL COURT-MARTIALPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

FISCHER, Senior Judge:

A general court-martial composed, of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of conspiring to distribute an indecent visual recording, wrongfully viewing an indecent visual recording, and indecent conduct in violation of Articles 81, 120c, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 920c, and 934. 1 The members sentenced the appellant to six months of confinement, reduction to pay grade E-3, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority (CA) approved the sentence as adjudged, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. UriosteguiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  3. United States v. Specialist CEY BRISTOL J. WILLIAMSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  4. United States v. CooksUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. LasterNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API