Legal Opinion

Richison v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 7, 2012No. 11-2274PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Larold Richison, a 51-year-old kidney-transplant recipient with a history of foot problems, appeals from the district court’s decision upholding the denial of his application for disability benefits. Because substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s determination, we affirm the judgment.

Richison struggled with numerous physical problems in recent years, chief among them kidney failure and severe stiffness in both of his big toes. His kidney problems forced him to quit his job as a hardware store clerk in 1996, leading to a seven-year period when he received disability insurance.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Roberta Skinner v. Michael J. Astrue, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Schmidt v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Orienti v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  2. Hunt v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  3. Adams v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  4. Rogers v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  5. Allen v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API