Richison v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Larold Richison, a 51-year-old kidney-transplant recipient with a history of foot problems, appeals from the district court’s decision upholding the denial of his application for disability benefits. Because substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s determination, we affirm the judgment.
Richison struggled with numerous physical problems in recent years, chief among them kidney failure and severe stiffness in both of his big toes. His kidney problems forced him to quit his job as a hardware store clerk in 1996, leading to a seven-year period when he received disability insurance.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Roberta Skinner v. Michael J. Astrue, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Schmidt v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Orienti v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Hunt v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Adams v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Rogers v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Allen v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.