Legal Opinion

State v. Bickerton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 16, 1963No. File No. CR 12-3968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

The defendant was prosecuted under § 53-304 of the General Statutes and found guilty of neglecting or refusing to furnish reasonably necessary support to his wife. It is undisputed that the complaining witness, Mildred Bickerton, is the wife of the defendant and that he has failed to support her. His sole claim on appeal is that this failure was excused or justified because of the fault of his wife.

The defendant and his wife were married in December, 1959, and lived together until March, 1961, except for a short period of separation during the latter part of 1960. Both had been married before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Koniak v. KoniakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. State v. KaragavoorianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  2. State v. MansyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API