Legal Opinion

Jung v. Kelly

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 30, 2020No. 1:16-cv-06097Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- x MIDEUM JUNG, : : DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, : : 16-CV-6097 (PK) -against- : : DIANE D. KELLY and MERCK & CO., INC., : : Defendants. : : ------------------------------------------------------------ x Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge: Mideum Jung (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against Diane D. Kelly and Merck & Co., Inc. (“Defendants”), alleging a “serious injury” under New York Insurance Law Section 5102(d) to recover for injuries suffered as a result of a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API