Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Atkins v. Reiten
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 25, 1961No. Civ. No. A-13071PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, District Judge.
The use plaintiff brings this action in the name of the United States of America under the provisions of the Miller Act (Section 270b, Title 40 U.S.C.A., 49 Stat. 794) to recover equipment rentals claimed due from the Reiten & Stewart Construction Company as contractor and the Continental Casualty Company as surety upon the payment bond in connection with a government contract for the Bureau of Public Roads, an agency of the United States. The defendant surety company has moved to dismiss the third amended complaint of plaintiff for failure to state a claim against said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Gibson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Baker Contract Co. v. United States ex rel. PennockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lynam v. LivingstonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1966