Lynam v. Livingston
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEEL, District Judge.
The question for determination is whether plaintiff’s motion to further “amend” 1 her amended complaint (hereinafter “complaint”) to allege a “new cause of action” 1 should be granted over the objection of both the corporate defendant Livingston Oil Company (hereinafter “Oil Company”) and Julius Livingston, the individual defendant. To put this question in proper focus requires a recitation of certain prior proceedings in the case.
The complaint was filed on July 27, 1965. It alleges that plaintiff is and since August 13, 1964 has been the owner of common stock of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. ZuccaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Franks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Frank's v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- DeHaas v. Empire Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. Thomas O. Paine, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Ridgeway v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 134District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.