Legal Opinion
International Shoe Co. v. Kaufman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 11, 1925No. 7315PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.
Appellant sued appellee to recover balance due on an account' for goods and merchandise sold and due on an account alleged to be guaranteed by appellant in the following written instrument:
“To H. Ross, 1207% Lincoln Street,
Laredo, Texas.
“Roberts, Johnson & Band, Manufacturers, Branch of International Shoe Co. St. Louis— Gentlemen: In compliance with your request for a guaranty of the tenor following to establish with you a-credit for H. Ross of San Antonio, Texas, and in consideration of your extending the time for payment for the stock now. on hand and of your. shipping merchandise to said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Austin Real Estate & Abstract Co. v. BahnTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Travelers Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Wilkins v. Carter Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
- Palm v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tsesmelis v. Sinton State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- City Nat. Bank v. Eastland CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Longbotham v. LeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- TYLER BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.