Legal Opinion
Cranford v. City of Slidell
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided September 8, 1998No. Civil Action 97-797PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MENTZ, District Judge.
Before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs are current and/or former employees of the City of Slidell (“City”), Louisiana, who serve or served in the classification of Police Lieutenant. The plaintiffs filed suit in state court against the City seeking payment for overtime wages for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week. The City removed the case to federal court on the ground of federal question jurisdiction. The complaint asserts claims for overtime pay under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New Orleans, Etc. v. Civ. Service, Etc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. Betty L. Tianti, Commissioner of Labor of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- John J. Hilbert, Jr. v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mack v. Yankah (In re Yankah)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- City of Boston v. Commonwealth Employment Relations BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- McCoy v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014