Legal Opinion

Reed v. Burton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1955No. Docket 60, Calendar 46,447PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The plaintiff-appellant in this action is a director and stockholder of defendant Burton Mortgage Bond Company, a Michigan corporation. The defendants-appellees are 3 directors of the corporation. They have no other official duties with respect to the corporation. They sit on the board and they direct. We will call them naked directors, borrowing the expression from their brief, to distinguish them from the remaining directors, all of whom are officers of the corporation. (None of the latter group is a party to this appeal.)

The action arises out of a plan to dispose of certain real property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Wagner Electric Corp. v. Hydraulic Brake Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hunter v. Roberts, Throp & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Barrows v. J. N. Fauver Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of Detwiler v. OffenbecherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. In Re Butterfield EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Miller v. Magline, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Lytle v. MaladyMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass'n v. CITY OF DETRIOITMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API