Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1913No. 19,629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; E. W. Sutherlin, Judge. Action by W. M. Mitchell against James Murphy. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a verbal contract of partnership for an indefinite time, and there is a disagreement between them as to the terms thereof and as to the date of dissolution. Neither party was to furnish any money to the partnership stock. Plaintiff was to lend his credit to the firm for obtaining supplies, and defendant was to furnish the skill and labor to carry on the work. They engaged in the business of drilling oil wells, and the drilling rig with which they were to operate was bought on credit, and was subsequently paid for by the firm.

Plaintiff has filed two suits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Mitchell v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. SneedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Lewis E. Johnson v. The Secretary of and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Calavartenos v. Southeastern Raw Fur Merchants of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Dupuis v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. SneedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API