Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 6, 1913No. 19,295PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; E. W. Sutherlin, Judge. Action by W. M. Mitchell against James Murphy. From a judgment dissolving a writ of attachment because of insufficient bond, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.
Plaintiff takes a second appeal in this case from a judgment dissolving the'attachment because of the insufficiency of the bond.
The bond given for the issuance of the writ' of attachment is as follows:
“State of Louisiana, Parish of Caddo.
“Know All Men 'by These Presents:
“That we, W. M. Mitchell, as principal, and J. W. Clark, as security, are held and firmly bound unto to S. A. Leonard, clerk First judicial district, in the full sum of fifty-four hundred dollars, for payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs and representatives, firmly and in solido by these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sauer v. Union Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
- Bonner v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
- Lehman, Stern & Co. v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- Graham v. BurckhalterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
- Hann v. RuseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
3Cited by3 opinions
- Antoine v. HamiltonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mitchell v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Rowe v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936