Legal Opinion
State v. Ryder
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 2011No. SC 18411PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Gary Ryder, appeals1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence obtained as a result of the warrantless search of his home. State v. Ryder, 114 Conn. App. 528, 969 A.2d 818 (2009). The defendant claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that the warrantless search of his house did not violate his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. We agree with the defendant, and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CoccomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Sousa v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- TOWN OF BOZRAH v. ChmurynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. KendrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.