United Farm Workers of America v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*270Opinion
HOPPER, J.
In this case we are called upon to determine whether the superior court has jurisdiction to entertain an action for declaratory relief as to bargaining rights of agricultural employers and agricultural employees. We conclude that the Agricultural Labor Relations Board1 has exclusive jurisdiction and that the superior court may not entertain such an action.
Real parties grow roses and employ farm workers in their operations. In November 1975, petitioner (herein UFW) won elections held under the Act with respect to employees of real parties. On December 3, 1975, the UFW was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- San Diego Teachers Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Kaplan's Fruit & Produce Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Montebello Rose Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Vargas v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.