Legal Opinion

Damron v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2003No. 20020295PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Damron is appealing an East Central Judicial District Court judgment dismissing his post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues he was not afforded effective assistance, because his attorney failed to advise him on his plea agreement and failed to interview alibi witnesses or investigate the facts surrounding the incident in question. We conclude the trial court did not err in dismissing Damron’s post-conviction relief claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when Damron failed to provide any eviden-tiary support for his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ernst v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Booth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rummer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API