Centeno v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The unfortunate suicide, for whose alleged wrongful death this action was brought by his administratrix, was permitted to leave the hospital wherein confined on the basis of the considered professional judgment of the attending psychiatrist that he would do better at home, in the bosom of his family, with necessary medication administered on an outpatient basis. There is not an iota of evidence to indicate that his opinion was other than honest. It is therefore completely irrelevant that plaintiff-appellant’s expert testified as is set forth in the dissent. Disagreement between professional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Toth v. Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- St. George v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- St. George v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Cook v. RezendeNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Schrempf v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Topel v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bell v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Paddock v. ChackoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Centeno v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.